ABA Smart Cities Conference
December 19, 2018
Legislative Advocacy in Arizona
December 19, 2018
February 1, 2019 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm America/Phoenix Timezone
Beus Center for Law and Society
111 E. Taylor Street Phoenix AZ 85004
Christopher Marohn

Join ASU Law Alumni Association and ASU Law CLE for the first lunch and learn with an ASU Law Professor. Friday Februray 1, 2019. Prof. Sellers will be discussing his recently publish paper entitled Legislating Against Lying in Campaigns and Elections.  This is a Give What You Want Event for our Alumni, and lunch will be provided. Please register to give us a count for purchasing lunch.

Here the abstract of his paper and focus of this CLE.

Political speech receives robust protection under the First Amendment, but lying in campaigns and elections is harmful to democracy. In light of the former, what can be done about the latter? In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in United States v. Alvarez, the answer to the question is uncertain. In Alvarez, six Justices supported the conclusion that intentional lies are protected under the First Amendment. The decision renders existing laws regulating intentionally false campaign and election speech extraordinarily vulnerable.

Discussed in the CLE and Essay, Prof Sellers will consider three circumstances in which narrowly drawn campaign and election speech restrictions are doctrinally defensible. The first is when foreign nationals, during a campaign or election, engage in intentionally false speech expressly advocating for or against the election of a candidate. The second is when intentionally false speech is used to undermine election administration. And the third is when a campaign or outside political group intentionally falsifies a mandatory disclosure filing. Aside from quite limited circumstances such as these, it is exceptionally difficult to craft novel campaign and election speech restrictions that can survive a First Amendment challenge.